← All research
AAMAS 2026 · ASI WorkshopWorkshop

How do different moral priorities affect cooperation among artificial agents?

A shared-space simulation studies the interaction of moral profiles, episodic memory, and feedback on individual contributions.

Agent AAgent BAgent CAgent DShared spaceIllustrative priorities · Repeated interaction

Conceptual illustration of an artificial-agent simulation. This is not experimental data or a model of human populations.

01 / The approach

Study design

Four LLM agents interact in a shared-dormitory simulation. Illustrative profiles based on Moral Foundations Theory shape their prompts and memories. A QMIX module provides contribution feedback. The study compares 15 compositions of the four-agent group.

Inside the paper

Different priorities inside one shared dormitory.

Enlarge
Original Figure 1: a four-agent dormitory environment connects a language-model agent system, moral-profile prompts, episodic memory updates, a QMIX credit-assignment module, and experimental metrics.

The architecture connects profile-conditioned actions, shared consequences, memory, and contribution feedback. Country-derived labels identify the paper’s artificial profile prompts; they are not claims about real populations.

Experience becomes memory

Action histories, rewards, and profile-specific lessons feed into subsequent decisions.

Credit returns to the agent

QMIX decomposes team value into individual contribution signals. The experiment varies 15 group compositions.

Lee, Ryu & Yoo · AAMAS ASI 2026 · Figure 1 from the non-archival workshop paper. Paper ↗

Different priorities inside one shared dormitory.

Original Figure 1: a four-agent dormitory environment connects a language-model agent system, moral-profile prompts, episodic memory updates, a QMIX credit-assignment module, and experimental metrics.

Lee, Ryu & Yoo · AAMAS ASI 2026 · Figure 1 from the non-archival workshop paper. Open image ↗

02 / What we found

Findings

In this simulation, profile composition affects collective welfare, communication, and the stability of credit assignment. Memory and feedback create a way to study how differing priorities influence repeated interaction.

Scope & limitations

This is a non-archival workshop poster paper. The agents and profiles are an artificial experimental setting. The results do not characterize real national populations or justify decisions about grouping people.

Further questions

What kinds of memory and feedback support useful coordination when agents approach the same event with different priorities?

Research directions
Publication details

Manners Maketh MAN: Moral-Profile Diversity and Cooperative Dynamics in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Simulation

Keeheon Lee, Kunhee Ryu, and Hogyun Yoo

AAMAS 2026 · ASI Workshop · Workshop

BibTeX citation
@misc{lee2026moralprofiles,
  title={Manners Maketh MAN: Moral-Profile Diversity and Cooperative Dynamics in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Simulation},
  author={Lee, Keeheon and Ryu, Kunhee and Yoo, Hogyun},
  year={2026},
  note={ASI Workshop at AAMAS 2026. Non-archival poster paper}
}
Next paperRules and moral profiles in agent simulations